a9a38da454* Studio: decide diffusion routing before the SWA resolver Loading a DiffusionGemma GGUF could fail with "llama-server failed to start. Check that the GGUF file is valid" while llama-diffusion-cli ran the same model fine. _read_gguf_metadata set self._is_diffusion after calling _resolve_swa_pattern, both inside one try/except. The resolver reaches into transformers/HF, which can raise for an architecture transformers does not know (diffusion-gemma); the shared except then swallowed it and left _is_diffusion False, so the model was routed to plain llama-server instead of the diffusion runner. It only reproduced where the SWA pattern was not already cached/inline. Set _is_diffusion right after the KV parse loop (before the resolver) so a resolver error can no longer drop the routing, and skip the resolver for diffusion models, which do not use Studio's SWA pattern. * [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci --------- Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| data_recipe | ||
| export | ||
| inference | ||
| rag | ||
| training | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| _torchao_stub.py | ||
| tool_healing.py | ||