a6f6022bd0
Reviewer round 8 surfaced a real false positive in the previous commit:
a final answer naturally titled "Plan:" / "My plan:" / "Approach:" with
numbered content items now slipped through _INTENT_SIGNAL and got
wiped by the synthetic STOP turn. Examples:
Plan:
1. Warm-up: Students review fractions.
2. Group practice.
3. Assessment.
My plan:
1. Breakfast: oatmeal and fruit.
2. Lunch: rice bowl.
3. Dinner: lentil soup.
Here is the plan you asked for. It is two pages long.
Add a lookahead requiring one of the conservative re-prompt action
verbs (search / fetch / verify / look up / call / compare / think /
respond / etc.) to appear within 120 chars after the "Plan:" /
"Approach:" / "Here is the plan" / "Here are my steps" marker. Plan
stalls whose items are tool actions ("Plan:\n1. search the docs\n2.
summarise the result") still match and re-prompt; prose plans whose
items are content do not.
Also mirror "first" in _PLAN_LIST_FRAMING so numbered action plans
that start with "First" stay disqualified even after the helper enters
the numbered-list branch.
Factor the action-verb set out as _REPROMPT_ACTION_VERBS so both
regexes share one source of truth.
Six new regression samples: three lesson / meal / weather plans that
must NOT wipe, three action-plan headers that must re-prompt, three
prose "Here is the plan" answers that must not wipe.
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| assets | ||
| auth | ||
| core | ||
| loggers | ||
| models | ||
| plugins | ||
| requirements | ||
| routes | ||
| state | ||
| storage | ||
| tests | ||
| utils | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| _platform_compat.py | ||
| colab.py | ||
| main.py | ||
| run.py | ||
| startup_banner.py | ||