4f9986ecb9Small GGUF models (<9B) frequently generate full code or lengthy
explanations instead of calling tools, bypassing the existing
plan-without-action re-prompt mechanism. Three issues:
1. _REPROMPT_MAX_CHARS=500 was too low -- models that output full
HTML/code responses (often 1000+ chars) never triggered the
re-prompt at all, since it only fires on short responses.
2. _MAX_REPROMPTS=1 gave the model only one chance to comply.
Small models often need 2-3 nudges before switching from
text generation to tool calling.
3. The re-prompt text ("Please use the available tools...") was
too polite for small models to follow reliably.
4. Tool-calling detection missed chat templates using Jinja
whitespace-trimming syntax ({%- if tools -%}) since only
({%- if tools %}) and ({% if tools %}) were checked.
Changes:
- Raise _REPROMPT_MAX_CHARS from 500 to 2000 so longer responses
(code blocks, multi-paragraph plans) still trigger re-prompts
- Raise _MAX_REPROMPTS from 1 to 3 for more retry budget
- Use direct, imperative re-prompt language that small models
follow more reliably ("STOP. You MUST call a tool NOW.")
- Strengthen the system prompt tool nudge to explicitly forbid
outputting code blocks (redirect to the python tool instead)
- Add Jinja whitespace-trimmed variants to the tool_markers
list so all template styles are detected correctly
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| data_recipe | ||
| export | ||
| inference | ||
| training | ||
| __init__.py | ||