From 069aabb5641a84fb282c1c87d16f8debcfbe25b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: danielhanchen <unslothshared@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:57:17 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix stale sidebar account-block test regex after markup
 change

test_sidebar_account_block_uses_leading_tight hardcoded flex flex-col
adjacency, but the account-block divs in app-sidebar.tsx now carry
min-w-0 (and flex-1) between flex and flex-col following the sidebar
truncation work (#7171). The leading-tight class is still present, so
this is a stale test rather than a UI regression. Loosen the regex to
allow the extra layout utilities while still asserting the leading-*
class the guard exists for.
---
 tests/studio/test_studio_text_descender_clipping.py | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/studio/test_studio_text_descender_clipping.py b/tests/studio/test_studio_text_descender_clipping.py
index 7cad6cacfe..52f073822e 100644
--- a/tests/studio/test_studio_text_descender_clipping.py
+++ b/tests/studio/test_studio_text_descender_clipping.py
@@ -34,10 +34,11 @@ def test_model_selector_trigger_label_uses_leading_tight():
 
 def test_sidebar_account_block_uses_leading_tight():
     src = _read(APP_SIDEBAR)
-    # Match the account-block parent div regardless of its gap utility; this
-    # guard is about the leading-* class, not the spacing.
+    # Match the account-block parent div regardless of its other layout
+    # utilities (min-w-0 / flex-1 / gap-*); this guard is about the leading-*
+    # class, not the surrounding spacing/sizing classes.
     pattern = re.compile(
-        r'<div\s+className="flex\s+flex-col\s+gap-\S+\s+(\S+)\s+group-data-\[collapsible=icon\]:hidden">',
+        r'<div\s+className="flex\b[^"]*\bflex-col\b[^"]*\s(\S+)\s+group-data-\[collapsible=icon\]:hidden">',
     )
     matches = pattern.findall(src)
     assert matches, "could not find sidebar account-block parent div"