feat(core): attach global native tools (#30832)

This commit is contained in:
Kit Langton 2026-06-04 23:12:17 -04:00 committed by GitHub
commit 64dc6d39ab
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
39 changed files with 647 additions and 71 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
# Core Tool Architecture
This folder owns Core-native tool definition, contribution, effective lookup, and execution. Keep those concerns distinct even though `ToolRegistry` brings them together at runtime.
## Current Architecture
```txt
Public Tool.make NativeTool value ApplicationTools Location built-ins Location ToolRegistry Session runner
│ │ │ │ │ │
├─ construct ─────────▶ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ ├─ scoped attach ─────▶ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ ├─ scoped contributions ──▶ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ ├─ shared current entries ───────────────────────▶ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ ├─ effective definitions and settlement ──▶
│ │ │ │ │ │
```
There are three relevant representations:
- `native.ts` defines the plain Core-native executable value exposed publicly as `Tool.make(...)`. It combines an `@opencode-ai/llm` model-facing definition with a Session-aware handler.
- `application-tools.ts` stores process-scoped application contributions. It owns availability and scoped attachment, but it does not execute tools.
- `registry.ts` is the single execution registry. Each Location owns one registry, its built-in contributions, effective precedence, input/output validation, permissions, and settlement.
`ToolRegistry.Entry` is intentionally more powerful than the public native tool value. Internal Location tools may use Core-owned capabilities such as `assertPermission`; embedding applications receive only the narrow public execution context.
## Placement And Layers
- `ApplicationTools.Service` is process-scoped and must be shared by current and future Locations.
- `ToolRegistry.Service` is Location-scoped because built-in handlers close over Location services such as filesystem, permissions, and tool-output storage.
- `LocationServiceMap` constructs fresh Location services while receiving the shared `ApplicationTools.Service` as a dependency.
- `OpenCode.layer` exposes the same shared application-tool service through `opencode.tools.attach(...)`.
- `ToolRegistry.defaultLayer` creates isolated application-tool state. It is suitable for self-contained consumers and tests, but not when attachments must be shared with a separately constructed `LocationServiceMap`.
Do not make `ToolRegistry` process-global. Do not move Location resources into `ApplicationTools`. Do not construct independent `ApplicationTools.layer` instances when the caller expects one attachment to appear across Locations.
## Contribution And Precedence
Built-in Location tools contribute through `ToolRegistry.contribute(...)`. Application tools attach through `ApplicationTools.attach(...)`, exposed publicly as `opencode.tools.attach(...)`.
Both contribution mechanisms use `State` scoped transforms:
- Closing a contribution Scope rebuilds state without that contribution.
- A later same-name application attachment wins while active.
- Closing that later attachment reveals the earlier active application contribution.
- A Location tool always takes precedence over an application tool with the same name.
- Application attachment inputs are captured before registering the replayable transform; later caller mutation must not alter a contribution during an unrelated rebuild.
Do not introduce another application-specific tool type or registry. Plugins should contribute existing native tools or internal registry entries at the lifetime they actually own.
## Dynamic Removal Semantics
Definitions and settlement intentionally resolve the current effective tools independently. There is no provider-turn snapshot, attachment lease, or draining detach.
```txt
Embedding App ApplicationTools Location ToolRegistry Session Runner
│ │ │ │
├─ attach({ opencord_run }) ──▶ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ ◀─ definitions() ──────────────────┤
│ │ │ │
│ ◀─ entries() ────────────┤ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ ├─ current effective definitions ──▶
│ │ │ │
├─ attachment Scope closes ───▶ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ ◀─ settle(opencord_run) ───────────┤
│ │ │ │
│ ◀─ current lookup ───────┤ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ ├─ Unknown tool ───────────────────▶
│ │ │ │
```
Consequences of this choice:
- Closing an attachment Scope revokes the tool immediately for calls that have not started settling.
- A call produced from an earlier advertised definition may fail as unknown.
- If a same-name replacement is currently active, a later call may execute that replacement.
- An execution that already resolved its entry continues with the handler it captured.
- Attachment Scope closure does not wait for already-started executions. Applications whose handlers depend on scoped resources must coordinate graceful shutdown themselves.
These are deliberate simplifications. Do not add snapshots, semaphores, leases, or deferred finalizers without a concrete requirement for stronger consistency or graceful draining.
## File Roles
```txt
tool/
native.ts plain public/Core-native executable tool value
application-tools.ts process-scoped State-backed application contributions
registry.ts Location-scoped effective lookup, validation, and execution
builtins.ts shipped Location tool layer composition
read.ts, bash.ts, ... individual Location-scoped built-in contributions
```
Keep model/provider-neutral tool schemas and output projection in `@opencode-ai/llm`. Keep Session identity, permissions, Location precedence, and settlement in Core.
## Future Directions
Tool availability may eventually gain a real third scope, such as Session-specific or plugin-owned contributions:
```txt
╭─────────────────╮
│ Tool definition │
╰────────┬────────╯
╭────────────────────────────────────────╰╮─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ future ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ╮
│ │
▼ ▼ ▼
╭───────────────────────╮ ╭────────────────────────╮ ╭───────────────────────╮
│ Process contributions │ │ Location contributions │ │ Session contributions │
╰───────────┬───────────╯ ╰────────────┬───────────╯ ╰───────────┬───────────╯
│ │ │
│ │
╰─────────────────────────────────────────◀─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ future ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ╯
╭──────────────────────╮
│ Effective resolution │
╭─────────╰───────────┬──────────╯────────────╮
│ │ │
▼ ▼
╭───────────────────────────────╮ ╭─────────────────────────╮
│ Advertise current definitions │ │ Execute current handler │
╰───────────────────────────────╯ ╰─────────────────────────╯
```
Prefer these directions only when a concrete use requires them:
- **Contextual availability:** Add Session/agent/plugin filtering at effective resolution. Keep tool definitions independent from where they are enabled.
- **Hierarchical overlays:** If a third contribution scope becomes real, consider one registry abstraction with process, Location, and Session overlays rather than adding another special registry service.
- **Plugin tools:** Reuse the existing native tool value for restricted handlers and `ToolRegistry.Entry` for trusted Core-owned capabilities. Choose process or Location contribution lifetime explicitly.
- **Stale-call rejection:** If executing a same-name replacement is unsafe, attach an identity/version to advertised definitions and reject stale calls without retaining removed handlers.
- **Pinned provider turns:** If exact advertisement-to-execution consistency becomes necessary, snapshot effective entries for one provider turn. This weakens immediate revocation.
- **Graceful plugin unload:** If attachment-owned resources must outlive started executions, add explicit execution draining. Keep this separate from whether new calls can discover the tool.
- **Cluster placement:** `ApplicationTools` is process-global, not cluster-global. Cluster-wide contribution and execution ownership require a separate durable design.
When choosing stronger semantics, state which property matters: immediate revocation, stale-call rejection, exact handler pinning, or graceful resource draining. They are different guarantees and should not arrive as one bundled lifecycle mechanism.