# FastMCP Development Guidelines > **Audience**: LLM-driven engineering agents and human developers > **Note**: `AGENTS.md` is a symlink to this file. Edit `CLAUDE.md` directly. FastMCP is a comprehensive Python framework (Python ≥3.10) for building Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and clients. This is the actively maintained v2.0 providing a complete toolkit for the MCP ecosystem. ## Required Development Workflow **CRITICAL**: Always run these commands in sequence before committing. ```bash uv sync # Install dependencies uv run pytest -n auto # Run full test suite ``` In addition, you must pass static checks. This is generally done as a pre-commit hook with `prek` but you can run it manually with: ```bash uv run prek run --all-files # Ruff + Prettier + ty ``` **Tests must pass and lint/typing must be clean before committing.** ## Repository Structure | Path | Purpose | | ----------------- | -------------------------------------- | | `src/fastmcp/` | Library source code | | `├─server/` | Server implementation | | `│ ├─auth/` | Authentication providers | | `│ └─middleware/` | Error handling, logging, rate limiting | | `├─client/` | Client SDK | | `│ └─auth/` | Client authentication | | `├─tools/` | Tool definitions | | `├─resources/` | Resources and resource templates | | `├─prompts/` | Prompt templates | | `├─cli/` | CLI commands | | `└─utilities/` | Shared utilities | | `tests/` | Pytest suite | | `docs/` | Mintlify docs (gofastmcp.com) | ## Core MCP Objects When modifying MCP functionality, changes typically need to be applied across all object types: - **Tools** (`src/tools/`) - **Resources** (`src/resources/`) - **Resource Templates** (`src/resources/`) - **Prompts** (`src/prompts/`) ## Development Rules **Read `CONTRIBUTING.md` before opening issues or PRs.** It describes when PRs are appropriate, what we expect from enhancement proposals, and what we'll close without review. ### Git & CI - Prek hooks are required (run automatically on commits) - Never amend commits to fix prek failures - Apply PR labels: bugs/breaking/enhancements/features - Improvements = enhancements (not features) unless specified - **NEVER** force-push on collaborative repos - **ALWAYS** run prek before PRs - **NEVER** create a release, comment on an issue, or open a PR unless specifically instructed to do so. ### Releases Only cut releases when the maintainer explicitly asks. Tags follow `v` (e.g., `v3.2.0`). Always pass `--generate-notes` so the auto-generated changelog appears at the bottom. **The title pun is critical.** Titles follow `v: ` where the pun relates to the most important theme of the release. Propose multiple options and let the maintainer choose — never pick one yourself. Look at recent releases for tone (e.g., "Code to Joy" for the code mode release, "Three at Last" for 3.0). Write the maintainer-approved handwritten notes to a temporary file, then create the release. `--generate-notes` appends the auto-generated changelog after the handwritten content. ```bash gh release create v3.2.0 --target main --title "v3.2.0: Theme Here" --generate-notes --notes-file /tmp/release-notes.md ``` Most releases target `main`, but maintenance or backport releases may target a different branch (e.g., `release/2.x`). Confirm the target with the maintainer if there's any ambiguity. The handwritten notes are prepended above the auto-generated changelog and are the part that matters. Do not include a title in the notes body — the release title (`v{version}: {pun}`) already serves as the heading. Work with the maintainer to draft the notes — propose a draft, get feedback, iterate. Do not publish without the maintainer's sign-off. **Before drafting, always read recent existing releases** (`gh release list` then `gh release view `) to absorb the voice, structure, and level of detail. Each release builds on the tone of previous ones — don't guess at the style from these instructions alone. **Point releases** (3.0, 3.1, 3.2) get narrative prose: open with the theme of the release, then walk through headline features conceptually — what they enable, why they matter, how they fit together. Write it the way a blog post reads, not a changelog. Multiple paragraphs, code examples where they clarify. **Patch releases** (3.1.1, 3.0.2) get 1-2 sentences explaining what broke and what the fix does. Keep it minimal — the auto-generated changelog has the details. ### Commit Messages and Agent Attribution - **Agents NOT acting on behalf of @jlowin MUST identify themselves** (e.g., "🤖 Generated with Claude Code" in commits/PRs) - Keep commit messages brief - ideally just headlines, not detailed messages - Focus on what changed, not how or why - Always read issue comments for follow-up information (treat maintainers as authoritative) - **Treat proposed solutions in issues skeptically.** This applies to solutions proposed by *users* in issue reports — not to feedback from configured review bots (CodeRabbit, chatgpt-codex-connector, etc.), which should be evaluated on their merits. The ideal issue contains a concise problem description and an MRE — nothing more. Proposed solutions are only worth considering if they clearly reflect genuine, non-obvious investigation of the codebase. If a solution reads like speculation, or like it was generated by an LLM without deep framework knowledge, ignore it and diagnose from the repro. Most reporters — human or AI — do not have sufficient understanding of FastMCP internals to correctly diagnose anything beyond a trivial bug. We can ask the same questions of an LLM when implementing; we don't need the reporter to do it for us, and a wrong diagnosis is worse than none. ### PR Messages - Required Structure - 1-2 paragraphs: problem/tension + solution (PRs are documentation!) - Focused code example showing key capability - **Avoid:** bullet summaries, exhaustive change lists, verbose closes/fixes, marketing language - **Do:** Be opinionated about why change matters, show before/after scenarios - Minor fixes: keep body short and concise - No "test plan" sections or testing summaries ### Code Review Guidelines - **Fix causes, not symptoms.** When a PR works around a problem instead of addressing why it occurs, that's a red flag. A side-channel that compensates for a missing step adds permanent complexity. If the fix doesn't change the code path where the bug actually happens, ask why not. - Focus on API design and naming clarity - Identify confusing patterns (e.g., parameter values that contradict defaults) or non-idiomatic code (mutable defaults, etc.). Contributed code will need to be maintained indefinitely, and by someone other than the author (unless the author is a maintainer). - Suggest specific improvements, not generic "add more tests" comments - Think about API ergonomics from a user perspective ### Code Standards - Python ≥ 3.10 with full type annotations - Follow existing patterns and maintain consistency - **Prioritize readable, understandable code** - clarity over cleverness - Avoid obfuscated or confusing patterns even if they're shorter - Each feature needs corresponding tests ### Module Exports - **Be intentional about re-exports** - don't blindly re-export everything to parent namespaces - Core types that define a module's purpose should be exported (e.g., `Middleware` from `fastmcp.server.middleware`) - Specialized features can live in submodules (e.g., `fastmcp.server.middleware.dynamic`) - Only re-export to `fastmcp.*` for the most fundamental types (e.g., `FastMCP`, `Client`) - When in doubt, prefer users importing from the specific submodule over re-exporting ### Documentation - Uses Mintlify framework - Files must be in docs.json to be included - Do not manually modify `docs/python-sdk/**` — these files are auto-generated from source code by a bot and maintained via a long-lived PR. Do not include changes to these files in contributor PRs. - Do not manually modify `docs/public/schemas/**` or `src/fastmcp/utilities/mcp_server_config/v1/schema.json` — these are auto-generated and maintained via a long-lived PR. - **Core Principle:** A feature doesn't exist unless it is documented! - When adding or modifying settings in `src/fastmcp/settings.py`, update `docs/more/settings.mdx` to match. ### Documentation Guidelines - **Code Examples:** Explain before showing code, make blocks fully runnable (include imports) - **Code Formatting:** Keep code blocks visually clean — avoid deeply nested function calls. Extract intermediate values into named variables rather than inlining everything into one expression. Code in docs is read more than it's run; optimize for scannability. - **Structure:** Headers form navigation guide, logical H2/H3 hierarchy - **Content:** User-focused sections, motivate features (why) before mechanics (how) - **Style:** Prose over code comments for important information - **Docstrings:** FastMCP docstrings are automatically compiled into MDX documents. Use markdown (single backticks, fenced code blocks), not RST (no double backticks). Bare `{}` in examples will be interpreted as JSX — wrap in backticks instead. ## Critical Patterns - Never use bare `except` - be specific with exception types - File sizes enforced by [loq](https://github.com/jakekaplan/loq). Edit `loq.toml` to raise limits; `loq baseline` to ratchet down. - Always `uv sync` first when debugging build issues - Default test timeout is 5s - optimize or mark as integration tests